Traveling abroad and using credit card - will bank freeze my account?
I'm going to be traveling to South Korea. I'm going to use my VISA and Mastercard credit cards there. This is out of the ordinary for me, so I'm worried that my bank account will be frozen. The question is: Will my account be frozen AFTER I make the purchase (so the merchant will get the money), or will the transaction just not go through (so the merchant would not get the payment until I clear things up with the bank)?
Credit - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Call them the day before you go on your trip and tell them. Generally, if they see airline reservations from your home to your vacation destination you have nothing, absolutely nothing to worry about. If out of the blue, charges from another country start coming in, they will generally call you at your home number, if no answer, they may suspend charges. If you find yourself with your card being suspended on vacation, just call the 800 number in the back and tell them you are making the charges. You'll be fine, especially if that airline trip is on your credit card. The airline tickets will give the credit card company a clue that you are traveling on vacation. Any problems, a quick phone call will lift any suspensions. Enjoy..
2 :
The question should be asked of your bank - not Yahoo Answers.
3 :
The first thing you need to find out is whether your card would even work in the country you are going to be visiting. Second, ANYTIME you are going to be traveling to another country, the FIRST thing you do is contact your bank and TELL them you are going to be traveling and using your card in another country in order to prevent them from freezing your card and leaving you high and dry! Why you wouldn't just head this off and let your bank know your plans is beyond me. Why would you want to travel and then take a chance that you could use the card and then "just deal with it" when they freeze your account for unusual activity they think is fraud is nuts.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
what would world war 3 be like?
what would world war 3 be like?
i know there is a lot of questions like this but if there was a ww3 this is how it would happen. NK or Iran fire missile at the US, so the us plan on having a conventional war with NK or Iran. China decides to back NK and so does russia and iran. ( i know that china has most of US debt and that the US buys most of chinas exports but i decided to leave finacial stuff out of it ). the US then gets backed by UK, Canada, Austrialia, south korea, japan,israel, some NATO forces.every country decides to leave nuclear weapons out of the war and keep it as conventional. china and NK attack south korea but japan helps south korea out there. iran and syria then attacks iraq but israel then attacks iran and syria . russia decides to attack UK. russia constanlyusing air attaacks on major citys in UK. UK then sends out planes to attack moscow and UK navy attacks russia. India will then get involved and they will join US side and they will stop a chinese attack but then pakistan joins in and attakcs india. the us will then send troops to every battle but will send most troops to help back up UK and also back up south korea. some NATO forces like a small number of french, german,italian, spanish( and a few other countrys) will help the UK out. Russia will then send some more troops to siberia section and the US will send more troops to alaska and youve now got russia vs usa in air and naval attacks. china and NK will beat south korea. (this will make japan, south korea retreat to japan to re organise. india will crush pakistan but with more chinese forces closing in on india it looks like india may lose but japan and south koreans will back them up. israel will crush iran and syria and will then help india out. UK back by some NATO forces and american forces do well agaisnt russia. UK navy destorys russian navy but russia still have domaint air force at he moment.the US do well agaisnt russia in alaska even with some chinese troops back up the russians. eventually india, southkorea,japan and israel begin to get organsised and start to push the chinese back to china. with russia now with barely any navy and an running out of oil decide to stop and end there conflict. so now youve got US,UK,Canada,Israel,India,south korea and japan all fighting china and NK. they slowly push the chinese back and south korea eventually regain there terratory.south korea and japan then invade NK. China now decides that they have know chance and they leave the conflict. now the US wants revenge agaisnt NK and they start a full on conventional war with NK. within a mattar of weeks the US, south korea and japan have taken all of NK. total number of deaths. 2 billion i know it probably wouldnt turn out like this with he financial stuff involved but think about it if china stops supplying the us with money then you think the US is fucked but then the US stops buy all of chinas exports and then chinas fucked. thanks ;)
Military - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Let China back whoever they wanna back. The American Military aka. The Unclimbable Mountain would turn the land they stand on into an ocean!
2 :
it would be like a waste of time to think about, you jackass
3 :
there is a famous quote fro Einstein. i dont know what weapons we will fight with in world war 3 but world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones
4 :
Your scenario sounds fairly accurate to me, nice job.
5 :
...and then you wake up.
i know there is a lot of questions like this but if there was a ww3 this is how it would happen. NK or Iran fire missile at the US, so the us plan on having a conventional war with NK or Iran. China decides to back NK and so does russia and iran. ( i know that china has most of US debt and that the US buys most of chinas exports but i decided to leave finacial stuff out of it ). the US then gets backed by UK, Canada, Austrialia, south korea, japan,israel, some NATO forces.every country decides to leave nuclear weapons out of the war and keep it as conventional. china and NK attack south korea but japan helps south korea out there. iran and syria then attacks iraq but israel then attacks iran and syria . russia decides to attack UK. russia constanlyusing air attaacks on major citys in UK. UK then sends out planes to attack moscow and UK navy attacks russia. India will then get involved and they will join US side and they will stop a chinese attack but then pakistan joins in and attakcs india. the us will then send troops to every battle but will send most troops to help back up UK and also back up south korea. some NATO forces like a small number of french, german,italian, spanish( and a few other countrys) will help the UK out. Russia will then send some more troops to siberia section and the US will send more troops to alaska and youve now got russia vs usa in air and naval attacks. china and NK will beat south korea. (this will make japan, south korea retreat to japan to re organise. india will crush pakistan but with more chinese forces closing in on india it looks like india may lose but japan and south koreans will back them up. israel will crush iran and syria and will then help india out. UK back by some NATO forces and american forces do well agaisnt russia. UK navy destorys russian navy but russia still have domaint air force at he moment.the US do well agaisnt russia in alaska even with some chinese troops back up the russians. eventually india, southkorea,japan and israel begin to get organsised and start to push the chinese back to china. with russia now with barely any navy and an running out of oil decide to stop and end there conflict. so now youve got US,UK,Canada,Israel,India,south korea and japan all fighting china and NK. they slowly push the chinese back and south korea eventually regain there terratory.south korea and japan then invade NK. China now decides that they have know chance and they leave the conflict. now the US wants revenge agaisnt NK and they start a full on conventional war with NK. within a mattar of weeks the US, south korea and japan have taken all of NK. total number of deaths. 2 billion i know it probably wouldnt turn out like this with he financial stuff involved but think about it if china stops supplying the us with money then you think the US is fucked but then the US stops buy all of chinas exports and then chinas fucked. thanks ;)
Military - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Let China back whoever they wanna back. The American Military aka. The Unclimbable Mountain would turn the land they stand on into an ocean!
2 :
it would be like a waste of time to think about, you jackass
3 :
there is a famous quote fro Einstein. i dont know what weapons we will fight with in world war 3 but world war 4 will be fought with sticks and stones
4 :
Your scenario sounds fairly accurate to me, nice job.
5 :
...and then you wake up.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Could we lose the korea war?
Could we lose the korea war?
United States have one milion active troops and the south has 670.000 and China and North Korea have 6 Million Troops not mentioning the reserve. Could US Military win this war conventional way if the war restart? i mean conventional is without nukes china also have advanced tech and they make more money if they win this war,you know they will be the world strongest superpower if you ask me why post this question again,i accidently click a button in action bar as remainder if we fight N.K Again china will intervene
Military - 8 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
you do realize if it came to a major war the US would bring in more troops right?
2 :
The amount of soldiers doesn't matter-Obviously we would bring a lot more. North Koreans are unskilled and their technology is a decade behind. The United States + Britain = Unstoppable. If North Korea goes to war they will get completely wiped off the planet. The United States and Britain are the most powerful forces on the planet. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete moron and oblivious to the facts.
3 :
yes. N. Korea would cream us in a war! So hopefully, we never have to go to war with them... ever!
4 :
Hopefully, Sarah Palin will bridge with our North Korean allies.
5 :
This isn't a war between North Korean ad South Korea just as it wasn't a war between North and South in the first Korean War. This is a war between US and China. China has a huge military with technology beyond our capabilities. Our military is worn down from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now China wants to play at us while we're down. Only recently has China developed a missile, the DOng Fend 21D, capable of sinking our aircraft carriers. Addtionally they have developed another type missile that can shoot down any and all of our military satellites. They have hacked into the electrical grid and have hacked into our most secure computer systems at the Pentagon. They have also developed a laser weapn far advanced than anything our military can offer. They have also figured out a method of poisoning most of the US population. War is approaching and to answer your question, we may lose this one and find ourselves under a communist regime.
6 :
my thought is that nobody wants to get mixed in with their rivalries, but maybe China will. China has a leader as crazy as North Korea. America, Britain,Russia have had their shit load of wars these days and i Dont think any countries want to get involved.
7 :
North Korea has China, US has NATO.
8 :
what do u mean if the us loses a korea war .. read your history we lost the 1st one . what makes u think we would the 2nd one
United States have one milion active troops and the south has 670.000 and China and North Korea have 6 Million Troops not mentioning the reserve. Could US Military win this war conventional way if the war restart? i mean conventional is without nukes china also have advanced tech and they make more money if they win this war,you know they will be the world strongest superpower if you ask me why post this question again,i accidently click a button in action bar as remainder if we fight N.K Again china will intervene
Military - 8 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
you do realize if it came to a major war the US would bring in more troops right?
2 :
The amount of soldiers doesn't matter-Obviously we would bring a lot more. North Koreans are unskilled and their technology is a decade behind. The United States + Britain = Unstoppable. If North Korea goes to war they will get completely wiped off the planet. The United States and Britain are the most powerful forces on the planet. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete moron and oblivious to the facts.
3 :
yes. N. Korea would cream us in a war! So hopefully, we never have to go to war with them... ever!
4 :
Hopefully, Sarah Palin will bridge with our North Korean allies.
5 :
This isn't a war between North Korean ad South Korea just as it wasn't a war between North and South in the first Korean War. This is a war between US and China. China has a huge military with technology beyond our capabilities. Our military is worn down from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now China wants to play at us while we're down. Only recently has China developed a missile, the DOng Fend 21D, capable of sinking our aircraft carriers. Addtionally they have developed another type missile that can shoot down any and all of our military satellites. They have hacked into the electrical grid and have hacked into our most secure computer systems at the Pentagon. They have also developed a laser weapn far advanced than anything our military can offer. They have also figured out a method of poisoning most of the US population. War is approaching and to answer your question, we may lose this one and find ourselves under a communist regime.
6 :
my thought is that nobody wants to get mixed in with their rivalries, but maybe China will. China has a leader as crazy as North Korea. America, Britain,Russia have had their shit load of wars these days and i Dont think any countries want to get involved.
7 :
North Korea has China, US has NATO.
8 :
what do u mean if the us loses a korea war .. read your history we lost the 1st one . what makes u think we would the 2nd one
Thursday, March 1, 2012
What is the average salary for foreign English teacher in Tokyo?
What is the average salary for foreign English teacher in Tokyo?
My wife and I are teaching English in South Korea at the moment. Our contract is almost finished and we are debating renewing it or moving to Japan (we were recently there on vacation and loved it). From the research I have done, it doesn't seem to make financial sense to make this move because of the high cost of living in Tokyo. Right now, we are saving a lot of money and I am worried that we wouldn't be able to do that in Tokyo. Does anybody know what the average wage of an English teacher in Tokyo is so that I can compare it with my research? Thanks.
Teaching - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Last time I checked most jobs in Japan only pay about $500 to $1000 more than Korea (about 250 000 to 300 000 Yen $2500 to $3000 US). However, because of the cost of living and most jobs require you to find your own house... that money is quickly burnt up. Of course if you have the education (Masters or PhD) and experience, you can look for a university. If you get a professional job, the salary really pays off.
My wife and I are teaching English in South Korea at the moment. Our contract is almost finished and we are debating renewing it or moving to Japan (we were recently there on vacation and loved it). From the research I have done, it doesn't seem to make financial sense to make this move because of the high cost of living in Tokyo. Right now, we are saving a lot of money and I am worried that we wouldn't be able to do that in Tokyo. Does anybody know what the average wage of an English teacher in Tokyo is so that I can compare it with my research? Thanks.
Teaching - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Last time I checked most jobs in Japan only pay about $500 to $1000 more than Korea (about 250 000 to 300 000 Yen $2500 to $3000 US). However, because of the cost of living and most jobs require you to find your own house... that money is quickly burnt up. Of course if you have the education (Masters or PhD) and experience, you can look for a university. If you get a professional job, the salary really pays off.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Where to teach English abroad?
Where to teach English abroad?
My fiance and I are looking to teach English abroad in 2010. Our main purpose is to make enough money to live and travel while we're there. We'd prefer not to become certified as this can get expensive. We were thinking South Korea but now are hearing lots of horror stories of corrupt companies not paying teachers. Anyone have any experience in this field?
Teaching - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I heard that Dubai is great. I know a couple of teachers that started there and one is now in Germany.
2 :
I have two friends who taught in China -- great experiences, but not sure how much money they made. Having traveled to Korea a couple of times, I cannot recommend the people there. (Sorry to sound xenophobic). We were not made to feel welcome, we were stared at on the street, and people even took pictures of us from cars. (Our family is blond, blue eyed.) We found a very "Korea is for Koreans" attitude there. Just our experience. Good luck wherever you land. It's a great thing you're doing!
My fiance and I are looking to teach English abroad in 2010. Our main purpose is to make enough money to live and travel while we're there. We'd prefer not to become certified as this can get expensive. We were thinking South Korea but now are hearing lots of horror stories of corrupt companies not paying teachers. Anyone have any experience in this field?
Teaching - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I heard that Dubai is great. I know a couple of teachers that started there and one is now in Germany.
2 :
I have two friends who taught in China -- great experiences, but not sure how much money they made. Having traveled to Korea a couple of times, I cannot recommend the people there. (Sorry to sound xenophobic). We were not made to feel welcome, we were stared at on the street, and people even took pictures of us from cars. (Our family is blond, blue eyed.) We found a very "Korea is for Koreans" attitude there. Just our experience. Good luck wherever you land. It's a great thing you're doing!
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Why do refugees pick USA, UK, Canada, OZ, NZ over rich Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan & Singapore?
Why do refugees pick USA, UK, Canada, OZ, NZ over rich Japan, S.Korea, Taiwan & Singapore?
Why do so many people trying to leave behind miserable conditions in nations in Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia, former Eastern Bloc nations pick the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and several Western European nations to make a new start, but they don't choose rich nations such as South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Japan? I know that South Korea now has some Nigerians, but generally most from the Third World would gravitate towards say, Australia or New Zealand before picking a rich Asian nation. Why is this? Why is the West a magnet for people of different races, but not the rich Asian nations that could take in immigrants as we do? Why is the West welcoming, but not Asia despite having money? The DPRK is an unusual situation, its refugees risk their lives to cross the border into China where they risk repatriation by Chinese authorities. If they can get to an embassy, the most logical place to send a North Korean is, of course, South Korea, which grants them citizenship as they are the same people. I would consider Japan rich based on having the third highest GDP in the world, a per-capita income over $30,000 (not that high compared to the price of living) and a generally high standard of living as surveyed by most leading organizations. The problem with Japan is, its long recession, its debt and the cost of living, but it is definitely one of the most economically developed nations on Earth and the Yen is an important currency.
Politics - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
because australia is the best country ever for them. they get here and have to wait a minimal amount of time in detention centers then boom full citizenship, money and housing. in most other countries theyd get shot or sent back where they came from!
2 :
There are refugees in the Far East, especially from the DPRK.
3 :
They are economic refugees and we don't want the liabilities. We are forced to take them by the United Nations as part of the United Nations quota allocation.
4 :
If they pick OZ, it's because they like being tall and aren't particularly afraid of witches. A big destination for those living in black and white cultures.
5 :
I believe that the reason they tend to gravitate to the specified countries is for a greater sense of freedom. While the Asian countries you mentioned are well off, they are not as well known as the former countries for their freedom, which is something people crave.
6 :
From where I stand it would appear that the UK is more than a fairly attractive place to get something for sweet ferkall if you pretend to be a refugee. We're fast becoming swamped by the dross of Eastern Europe & Asia.
7 :
It is a difference in culture. Many Eastern countries are far stricter as to who they're willing to admit as citizens, and certain Asian countries, Japan especially, are very homogeneous. They are very patriotic and take a great amount of pride in their heritage, and this can make them less welcoming to foreigners, which in turn gives foreign immigrants fewer opportunities in the work force. Please understand, I am not criticizing these nations in any way. I am just saying that they have different ways of looking at immigration. Also, the USA tends to attract immigrants because of its history of immigration. Since its beginning as a nation, the US has portrayed the image of a country built by people from many different backgrounds, whereas Eastern countries tend to pride their success on the hard work and rich histories and traditions of their own descendants. And of course, geography plays a role in the destination of immigrants. People from Central and South America are more likely to cross into the U.S because of its proximity, while people from underdeveloped European satellite countries are more likely to choose the nearby UK.
8 :
Well for starters Japan is certainly not Rich as you stated, and have many of the same troubles we do.I think most refugees find Countries with decent human rights and many more Freedoms more appealing than just having a Country with monetary wealth. I think out of any of those countries listed Canada Australia, and the United States have similar laws and customs that appeal to a higher quality of life than just being able to find a job sooner.........................
9 :
Actually, there's starting a pattern of people moving TO those countries from western countries. Many higher educated Americans and Europeans, for example are taking jobs over in those places, because the job market is more plentiful. Many of the Koreans, Taiwanese, and Japanese in the U.S. would love to move back, in fact, but the cost of living is way too high. Also, if they have school age children, the shock of the different education system is a little over-whelming.
Why do so many people trying to leave behind miserable conditions in nations in Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia, former Eastern Bloc nations pick the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and several Western European nations to make a new start, but they don't choose rich nations such as South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and Japan? I know that South Korea now has some Nigerians, but generally most from the Third World would gravitate towards say, Australia or New Zealand before picking a rich Asian nation. Why is this? Why is the West a magnet for people of different races, but not the rich Asian nations that could take in immigrants as we do? Why is the West welcoming, but not Asia despite having money? The DPRK is an unusual situation, its refugees risk their lives to cross the border into China where they risk repatriation by Chinese authorities. If they can get to an embassy, the most logical place to send a North Korean is, of course, South Korea, which grants them citizenship as they are the same people. I would consider Japan rich based on having the third highest GDP in the world, a per-capita income over $30,000 (not that high compared to the price of living) and a generally high standard of living as surveyed by most leading organizations. The problem with Japan is, its long recession, its debt and the cost of living, but it is definitely one of the most economically developed nations on Earth and the Yen is an important currency.
Politics - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
because australia is the best country ever for them. they get here and have to wait a minimal amount of time in detention centers then boom full citizenship, money and housing. in most other countries theyd get shot or sent back where they came from!
2 :
There are refugees in the Far East, especially from the DPRK.
3 :
They are economic refugees and we don't want the liabilities. We are forced to take them by the United Nations as part of the United Nations quota allocation.
4 :
If they pick OZ, it's because they like being tall and aren't particularly afraid of witches. A big destination for those living in black and white cultures.
5 :
I believe that the reason they tend to gravitate to the specified countries is for a greater sense of freedom. While the Asian countries you mentioned are well off, they are not as well known as the former countries for their freedom, which is something people crave.
6 :
From where I stand it would appear that the UK is more than a fairly attractive place to get something for sweet ferkall if you pretend to be a refugee. We're fast becoming swamped by the dross of Eastern Europe & Asia.
7 :
It is a difference in culture. Many Eastern countries are far stricter as to who they're willing to admit as citizens, and certain Asian countries, Japan especially, are very homogeneous. They are very patriotic and take a great amount of pride in their heritage, and this can make them less welcoming to foreigners, which in turn gives foreign immigrants fewer opportunities in the work force. Please understand, I am not criticizing these nations in any way. I am just saying that they have different ways of looking at immigration. Also, the USA tends to attract immigrants because of its history of immigration. Since its beginning as a nation, the US has portrayed the image of a country built by people from many different backgrounds, whereas Eastern countries tend to pride their success on the hard work and rich histories and traditions of their own descendants. And of course, geography plays a role in the destination of immigrants. People from Central and South America are more likely to cross into the U.S because of its proximity, while people from underdeveloped European satellite countries are more likely to choose the nearby UK.
8 :
Well for starters Japan is certainly not Rich as you stated, and have many of the same troubles we do.I think most refugees find Countries with decent human rights and many more Freedoms more appealing than just having a Country with monetary wealth. I think out of any of those countries listed Canada Australia, and the United States have similar laws and customs that appeal to a higher quality of life than just being able to find a job sooner.........................
9 :
Actually, there's starting a pattern of people moving TO those countries from western countries. Many higher educated Americans and Europeans, for example are taking jobs over in those places, because the job market is more plentiful. Many of the Koreans, Taiwanese, and Japanese in the U.S. would love to move back, in fact, but the cost of living is way too high. Also, if they have school age children, the shock of the different education system is a little over-whelming.
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Does this make me crazy or smart?
Does this make me crazy or smart?
-The majority of mainstream music is garbage -I figure we are doomed no matter who we elect -I think the world is going to change dramatically or end soon -The economy cannot be fixed, as printing more money is not the solution -China is going to become the world's new superpower -The government is run by a secret society -The freemasons are alive and well -The school system is messed up -The federal reserve system steals our money -Cannabis should be legal -Alcohol and tobacco should be illegal -Black people shouldn't get offended when white people say "ni gga" -Russia is up to something -There will never be peace in the Middle East, as long as Israel is still on the map -The antichrist will reveal himself (if real) in the next 10 years -Barack Obama or John McCain could be the antichrist -Climate change is real -The government poisons everything including food, air, and water -Medicine is not good for you, it makes you worse, so you will buy more drugs, thus giving the government more money -The government hypnotizes everyone -With the money that the freemasons steal from the people, they spend it on their goal to control the world. -No one will wake up to see because we are all blind -World war 3 is inevitable -There are to many religions to live in peace -All the media is controled by the government -Extra terrestrials are very real and the US government wont admit it. -JFK was not assasinated by a lone gunman, the secrety society that runs the government did it. -AIDS was created by humans -There are cures for alot of diseases, but the drug industries are controled by the government, which will never let this information out. Because then that would stop people from buying medical treatment and drugs. -Disease is also used as a popultion control -Homosexuality is wrong and inhumane -Cats are not simple house pets, they are shapeshifters watching our every move. -Reptilians are possibly real and contribute or control the freemasons -David icke is not a phony -We need a president who will speak the truth before they kill him, so the people will wake up and revolt and start the revolution. -Overpopulation is going to be a major issue in the future, if we make it till then -The medias obssesion with celebertys is pathetic -Religion causes conflict and war, if you trace it back far enough -The government knew and possibly was involved with the september 11 attacks -There is for sure life on other planets, considering there are over 21,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 different galaxys -China is eventually going to invade Taiwan -Russia is eventually going to invade every country in the CIS who dissagrees with them -North Korea will attack South Korea -Everyone who thinks Marijuana is bad for your health is misinformed and have been lied to. -How could Noah have gathered 2 of every animal on the ark? That would be impossible. How would he collect 2 of every bird?! -If they teach me evolution in school, how can anyone expect me to be christian? -No one will ever know the meaning of life untill the end of time, and maybe not even then -God could possibly be an alien who brought life to earth -Bill Clinton was one of the best presidents in history -George Bush comes off stupid, but he is a mastermind because he orcistrated 9/11 without any evidence coming back to him -We are not hunting Osama Bin Laden -There are more members in Al Queda now than there was before we invaded Iraq/Afganistan -Obama fits the description of the antichrist. Someone who rises up from no where, promises hope and change, and people adore -After 3 1/2 years of people adoring him he will show his true side -Something will happen on december 21 2012, whether its the world ending or dramaticly changing -Proof that bombs were planted in the twin towers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw
Current Events - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I agree with some and disagree with others. Means your human and have your opinions. Nothing more, nothing less.
2 :
You bring manufacturing back home and we will kick butt. Then we can give a little out again to other countries to do. A little I said.
3 :
i really like.. God could possibly be an alien who brought life to earth and Russia is up to something.
4 :
Overall, I'd say much more smart than crazy. Some if your ideals are over the top, but you've got your head on straight. -People of African descent do have a right to be offended when persons of other backgrounds call them the N word, just as anyone has a right to be upset if someone attempts to offend them with a racial slur. Yet, it's not what someone calls you...it's what you respond to. -Maybe some of the stories in the Bible aren't meant to be taken literally. Maybe it was two kinds of every animal in that particular area at that particular time, and maybe there weren't that many then. -God is not an alien. Life had to have begun by a force bigger than what we so far are able to determine, and you can call that whatever you want; God...Abiogenesis - whatever. -Bush isn't the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks; His cronies were. -Obama actually does not fit the description of the anti-Christ if you do a little more research. -There might be a magnetic pole shift in 2012; so far it's just a theory.
5 :
"JFK was not assassinated by a lone gunman, the secret society that runs the government did it." This is my favorite. The Truth. Johnny Roselli killed President Kennedy from the grassy knoll. He was not alone. The other gunman was in a closet, which had a window, on the third floor of the Texas Book Depository. Lee Harvey Oswald was standing in the door way of said Depository as the motorcade turn the curve right in front of him. He was getting ready to run.......a decoy. I don't believe you are nuts. Yes, you have an inquiring mind. I agree with more of what you wrote than disagree. By the way, Jimmy Hoffa's body is in the foundation of what is now a day care center. It's true.
6 :
"Crazy" and "smart" aren't mutually exclusive...wait...did I just figure out the answer?
-The majority of mainstream music is garbage -I figure we are doomed no matter who we elect -I think the world is going to change dramatically or end soon -The economy cannot be fixed, as printing more money is not the solution -China is going to become the world's new superpower -The government is run by a secret society -The freemasons are alive and well -The school system is messed up -The federal reserve system steals our money -Cannabis should be legal -Alcohol and tobacco should be illegal -Black people shouldn't get offended when white people say "ni gga" -Russia is up to something -There will never be peace in the Middle East, as long as Israel is still on the map -The antichrist will reveal himself (if real) in the next 10 years -Barack Obama or John McCain could be the antichrist -Climate change is real -The government poisons everything including food, air, and water -Medicine is not good for you, it makes you worse, so you will buy more drugs, thus giving the government more money -The government hypnotizes everyone -With the money that the freemasons steal from the people, they spend it on their goal to control the world. -No one will wake up to see because we are all blind -World war 3 is inevitable -There are to many religions to live in peace -All the media is controled by the government -Extra terrestrials are very real and the US government wont admit it. -JFK was not assasinated by a lone gunman, the secrety society that runs the government did it. -AIDS was created by humans -There are cures for alot of diseases, but the drug industries are controled by the government, which will never let this information out. Because then that would stop people from buying medical treatment and drugs. -Disease is also used as a popultion control -Homosexuality is wrong and inhumane -Cats are not simple house pets, they are shapeshifters watching our every move. -Reptilians are possibly real and contribute or control the freemasons -David icke is not a phony -We need a president who will speak the truth before they kill him, so the people will wake up and revolt and start the revolution. -Overpopulation is going to be a major issue in the future, if we make it till then -The medias obssesion with celebertys is pathetic -Religion causes conflict and war, if you trace it back far enough -The government knew and possibly was involved with the september 11 attacks -There is for sure life on other planets, considering there are over 21,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 different galaxys -China is eventually going to invade Taiwan -Russia is eventually going to invade every country in the CIS who dissagrees with them -North Korea will attack South Korea -Everyone who thinks Marijuana is bad for your health is misinformed and have been lied to. -How could Noah have gathered 2 of every animal on the ark? That would be impossible. How would he collect 2 of every bird?! -If they teach me evolution in school, how can anyone expect me to be christian? -No one will ever know the meaning of life untill the end of time, and maybe not even then -God could possibly be an alien who brought life to earth -Bill Clinton was one of the best presidents in history -George Bush comes off stupid, but he is a mastermind because he orcistrated 9/11 without any evidence coming back to him -We are not hunting Osama Bin Laden -There are more members in Al Queda now than there was before we invaded Iraq/Afganistan -Obama fits the description of the antichrist. Someone who rises up from no where, promises hope and change, and people adore -After 3 1/2 years of people adoring him he will show his true side -Something will happen on december 21 2012, whether its the world ending or dramaticly changing -Proof that bombs were planted in the twin towers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw
Current Events - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I agree with some and disagree with others. Means your human and have your opinions. Nothing more, nothing less.
2 :
You bring manufacturing back home and we will kick butt. Then we can give a little out again to other countries to do. A little I said.
3 :
i really like.. God could possibly be an alien who brought life to earth and Russia is up to something.
4 :
Overall, I'd say much more smart than crazy. Some if your ideals are over the top, but you've got your head on straight. -People of African descent do have a right to be offended when persons of other backgrounds call them the N word, just as anyone has a right to be upset if someone attempts to offend them with a racial slur. Yet, it's not what someone calls you...it's what you respond to. -Maybe some of the stories in the Bible aren't meant to be taken literally. Maybe it was two kinds of every animal in that particular area at that particular time, and maybe there weren't that many then. -God is not an alien. Life had to have begun by a force bigger than what we so far are able to determine, and you can call that whatever you want; God...Abiogenesis - whatever. -Bush isn't the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks; His cronies were. -Obama actually does not fit the description of the anti-Christ if you do a little more research. -There might be a magnetic pole shift in 2012; so far it's just a theory.
5 :
"JFK was not assassinated by a lone gunman, the secret society that runs the government did it." This is my favorite. The Truth. Johnny Roselli killed President Kennedy from the grassy knoll. He was not alone. The other gunman was in a closet, which had a window, on the third floor of the Texas Book Depository. Lee Harvey Oswald was standing in the door way of said Depository as the motorcade turn the curve right in front of him. He was getting ready to run.......a decoy. I don't believe you are nuts. Yes, you have an inquiring mind. I agree with more of what you wrote than disagree. By the way, Jimmy Hoffa's body is in the foundation of what is now a day care center. It's true.
6 :
"Crazy" and "smart" aren't mutually exclusive...wait...did I just figure out the answer?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)