why is our country poor?
Rather it's Japan, China, U.S., German, Europe, anywhere. How come the economy is bad???? Why can't the government just pour money to everyone, so everyone becomes rich???? Isn't money everything? If I was president of a country, i would give everyone 10 million dollars, and the whole world will be happy.... I mean, I heard if u do that, the value of money will drop.. but why does it HAVE to drop?? Can't we make it... not drop??? Also, i don't get why there's teams around countries. like U.S. is teamed up with South Korea and stuff... and why other countries are united with other countries... Humans are humans isn't it? How come we can't all live in harmony??
Government - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
because we have 2 corrupt partys out of ideals and out of ethics they are both corrupt and real change , massive change is needed from our corrupt broken SYSTEM vote 3rd party to save america
2 :
We can only do that once we begin taxing the billionaires again. George Bush signed a bill in 2002 that cut their taxes, leaving the burden on us. Spread the wealth, that's the only way people like us will ever become "rich," as you say. You should read Noam Chomsky, my man.
3 :
Please take Economics 101 and answer your own question.
4 :
THE FAR LEFT LOONS ARE IN CHARGE
5 :
WOW,THE SO CALL,FIRST WORLD ,HAVE A LOT OF POOR PEOPLE? LOS ANGELES,CHICAGO,NEW YORK,AND SOO MANY MORE? OR MAYBE THE POOR PEOPLE OF PARIS,LONDON ? THIS PEOPLE JOIN THE FIRST WORLD OF POOR AN NEDY PEOPLE? BUT THE POOR PEOPLE OF LATINAMERICA ,ARE SOME KIND OF THIRD KIND,OUR POLITICIANS LET THEM BE,AND WE ARE IDIOTS ALL AROUND?
6 :
If everyone has $10 million then the value of having that much money greatly depraciates. It is simple supply and demand. Everyone has lots of money, so prices can go up (because there is the supply of cash to meet this demand). So then everything costs considerably more than it does now, therefore $10 million becomes equivalent to having $100. Look at hyper inflation cases in Argentina and Zimbabwe of late (gives an example of when currency becomes irrelevant). Poor countries aren't "poor" because of the money either (well not solely). Education, political structures (corruption), foreign debt, lack of resources (wealth within the country), etc etc all contribute to the status of a nation.
7 :
Expanding on what mintie_boy said, The dollar is a Fiat currency. Nothing is backing its value. So the dollars value is mostly dependent on the amount of dollars in circulation. The more dollars you put in to the system the lower the value becomes until it reaches an equilibrium. In order to make the value not drop you would either A have complete control of the prices in every industry or B back the dollar up with something of value that won't depreciate in large quantities. B will not necessarily prevent prices from rising. As to teams of countries as you put it, there are multitudes of reasons why some countries align with others. A few would be sharing certain ideals, goals or complaints...
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Saturday, September 14, 2013
Please help me with dividing paragraphs?
Please help me with dividing paragraphs?
I'm a South Korean teenage girl learning English as my second language. There was a writing assignment in my school and I have trouble dividing the paragraphs into intro, body and conclusion. Please help me. My essay topic is: What are your opinions on world trade and globalization? My essay: Let’s say that you are an orange farmer in South Korea, and, you are just starting up your first business. You aim to market domestically and will be able to employ over 50 laborers. What problems will you face? You would be worried about competition from South Asia and Africa, especially plantations in Philipines or Indonesia, because that’s where climates are adequate to grow grapes, and it’s also much cheaper to produce there. However, it puts our industries and government in an awkward position. It takes our chances to make any profits if we are purchasing foreign products rather than developing our own businesses. That’s why countries employ protective trade measures against globalization. It is important to give their own industries space to grow until they are strong enough to compete with foreign markets. The use of tariffs can be a good example, or other kind of regulations and barriers on trade arrangements. Some might ask, “how does this all fit into globalization? We all know that the economy today is fueled by imports and exports.†However, we should not forget that the world is still undergoing changes due to increased globalization. It’s true that the more open a country’s laws are the more that they can go in and out, financially and otherwise. So that’s why some people are advocates of a free trade system. They argue that if the market were completely free, then it would balance itself according to the pressures of market happening today. However, we should remember that not everybody is ready for the money to go around. The main point is that, most countries would not sacrifice their own stability in order to balance out the economies of other nations! In this point of view, the major premise of free trade, that of allowing for a less self-secure and more globally centered trade system is not very attractive to begin with. At this point of time, what might say that most nations would consider globalization if they knew that their economic stability would increase in the end. And this is where the big debate lies. Globalization is based on a theory, but in reality that theory doesn’t work out quite so smoothly. On a social level, as soon as one person wants to make more than others, globalization is thrown out the window. Then, of course, there are practical implications on the development of new businesses and industries. Globalization and an open trade market means that competition is so high that only the top companies succeed, not to mention the fact that small, family owned businesses don’t stand a chance. That’s why countries are cautious and self-defensive with respect to trade. There is a need to preserve and develop one’s own production. For both developing and developed nations right now, it’s something that’s necessary.
Homework Help - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Let’s say that you are an orange farmer in South Korea, and, you are just starting up your first business. You aim to market domestically and will be able to employ over 50 laborers. What problems will you face? You would be worried about competition from South Asia and Africa, especially plantations in Philipines or Indonesia, because that’s where climates are adequate to grow grapes, and it’s also much cheaper to produce there. However, it puts our industries and government in an awkward position. It takes our chances to make any profits if we are purchasing foreign products rather than developing our own businesses. That’s why countries employ protective trade measures against globalization. It is important to give their own industries space to grow until they are strong enough to compete with foreign markets. The use of tariffs can be a good example, or other kind of regulations and barriers on trade arrangements. Some might ask, “how does this all fit into globalization? We all know that the economy today is fueled by imports and exports.†However, we should not forget that the world is still undergoing changes due to increased globalization. It’s true that the more open a country’s laws are the more that they can go in and out, financially and otherwise. So that’s why some people are advocates of a free trade system. They argue that if the market were completely free, then it would balance itself according to the pressures of market happening today. However, we should remember that not everybody is ready for the money to go around. The main point is that, most countries would not sacrifice their own stability in order to balance out the economies of other nations! In this point of view, the major premise of free trade, that of allowing for a less self-secure and more globally centered trade system is not very attractive to begin with. At this point of time, what might say that most nations would consider globalization if they knew that their economic stability would increase in the end. And this is where the big debate lies. Globalization is based on a theory, but in reality that theory doesn’t work out quite so smoothly. On a social level, as soon as one person wants to make more than others, globalization is thrown out the window. Then, of course, there are practical implications on the development of new businesses and industries. Globalization and an open trade market means that competition is so high that only the top companies succeed, not to mention the fact that small, family owned businesses don’t stand a chance. That’s why countries are cautious and self-defensive with respect to trade. There is a need to preserve and develop one’s own production. For both developing and developed nations right now, it’s something that’s necessary.
I'm a South Korean teenage girl learning English as my second language. There was a writing assignment in my school and I have trouble dividing the paragraphs into intro, body and conclusion. Please help me. My essay topic is: What are your opinions on world trade and globalization? My essay: Let’s say that you are an orange farmer in South Korea, and, you are just starting up your first business. You aim to market domestically and will be able to employ over 50 laborers. What problems will you face? You would be worried about competition from South Asia and Africa, especially plantations in Philipines or Indonesia, because that’s where climates are adequate to grow grapes, and it’s also much cheaper to produce there. However, it puts our industries and government in an awkward position. It takes our chances to make any profits if we are purchasing foreign products rather than developing our own businesses. That’s why countries employ protective trade measures against globalization. It is important to give their own industries space to grow until they are strong enough to compete with foreign markets. The use of tariffs can be a good example, or other kind of regulations and barriers on trade arrangements. Some might ask, “how does this all fit into globalization? We all know that the economy today is fueled by imports and exports.†However, we should not forget that the world is still undergoing changes due to increased globalization. It’s true that the more open a country’s laws are the more that they can go in and out, financially and otherwise. So that’s why some people are advocates of a free trade system. They argue that if the market were completely free, then it would balance itself according to the pressures of market happening today. However, we should remember that not everybody is ready for the money to go around. The main point is that, most countries would not sacrifice their own stability in order to balance out the economies of other nations! In this point of view, the major premise of free trade, that of allowing for a less self-secure and more globally centered trade system is not very attractive to begin with. At this point of time, what might say that most nations would consider globalization if they knew that their economic stability would increase in the end. And this is where the big debate lies. Globalization is based on a theory, but in reality that theory doesn’t work out quite so smoothly. On a social level, as soon as one person wants to make more than others, globalization is thrown out the window. Then, of course, there are practical implications on the development of new businesses and industries. Globalization and an open trade market means that competition is so high that only the top companies succeed, not to mention the fact that small, family owned businesses don’t stand a chance. That’s why countries are cautious and self-defensive with respect to trade. There is a need to preserve and develop one’s own production. For both developing and developed nations right now, it’s something that’s necessary.
Homework Help - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Let’s say that you are an orange farmer in South Korea, and, you are just starting up your first business. You aim to market domestically and will be able to employ over 50 laborers. What problems will you face? You would be worried about competition from South Asia and Africa, especially plantations in Philipines or Indonesia, because that’s where climates are adequate to grow grapes, and it’s also much cheaper to produce there. However, it puts our industries and government in an awkward position. It takes our chances to make any profits if we are purchasing foreign products rather than developing our own businesses. That’s why countries employ protective trade measures against globalization. It is important to give their own industries space to grow until they are strong enough to compete with foreign markets. The use of tariffs can be a good example, or other kind of regulations and barriers on trade arrangements. Some might ask, “how does this all fit into globalization? We all know that the economy today is fueled by imports and exports.†However, we should not forget that the world is still undergoing changes due to increased globalization. It’s true that the more open a country’s laws are the more that they can go in and out, financially and otherwise. So that’s why some people are advocates of a free trade system. They argue that if the market were completely free, then it would balance itself according to the pressures of market happening today. However, we should remember that not everybody is ready for the money to go around. The main point is that, most countries would not sacrifice their own stability in order to balance out the economies of other nations! In this point of view, the major premise of free trade, that of allowing for a less self-secure and more globally centered trade system is not very attractive to begin with. At this point of time, what might say that most nations would consider globalization if they knew that their economic stability would increase in the end. And this is where the big debate lies. Globalization is based on a theory, but in reality that theory doesn’t work out quite so smoothly. On a social level, as soon as one person wants to make more than others, globalization is thrown out the window. Then, of course, there are practical implications on the development of new businesses and industries. Globalization and an open trade market means that competition is so high that only the top companies succeed, not to mention the fact that small, family owned businesses don’t stand a chance. That’s why countries are cautious and self-defensive with respect to trade. There is a need to preserve and develop one’s own production. For both developing and developed nations right now, it’s something that’s necessary.
Saturday, September 7, 2013
What are some things you can do to advertise a host family to foreign exchange students?
What are some things you can do to advertise a host family to foreign exchange students?
My family is trying to host foreign exchange students from South Korea in our house. We have no income, so we have nothing else to do but this. We live in Howard County in Maryland, a #3 rated for its educational system. We want to spark some interest in those exchange students to come live and study here. We tried getting connections through a foreign exchange administering organization in South Korea, but they charge the students 5k and we get 600 per month. So we want to lower that by about 1k and receive the rest of the money; it is cheaper for the exchange student, and a plus for us. But we have absolutely NO way of selling ourselves. I was thinking website, but how can we verify our authenticity without looking suspicious as those computer ads? How can we make these people believe we are trustworthy people? PLEASE WHAT CAN WE DO? Note: We have already had one foreign exchange from South Korea, and he LOVED the experience. But connections that he gives us all say we are too expensive (because they are from a poorer region.) We do have ONE reference though; we just need to spread the word somehow. Ps. I see where you are coming from, but I would just like to state that that my siblings are the ones who are currently supporting our family in terms of income. The reason we can even stay in these parts of the neighborhood is because we can ONLY pay our morgage, electric, water, all living expenses. As for health insurance issues and such, this is all covered in the contract that we sign when they come to our house to homestay. There's even an associated dedicated to making money off of providing a house to stay in to get an education in America, so I'm sorry, but these foreign exchange students do not feel that what we do is terrible, nor do we. They require what is needed to succeed in America. They simply require a home to stay in in America, because their parents cannot afford to stay in America, but they need the good education that America provides them. I suppose it is not exactly a Foreign exchange program, more of a Rent for foreigners. Pss. The association is located in the Asian countries, so you would most likely not know about it; different rules apply, I suppose
Studying Abroad - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Your family has no income so you want to make money off the students you host. Do you not understand how completely terrible that sounds? If you are trying to host students who only want to come to the US to practice English and experience a new culture to make money, then your hearts are in entirely the wrong place. If your family has no money then you should not be hosting students--period. You should not be trying to arrange your own private hosting "service." I wouldn't be surprised if this was against the law for one (because you'll essentially be running a business without going through the proper channels), but also it is extremely dangerous for the kids involved. And I'm not saying that you are dangerous here. I'm not suggesting you might harm them purposefully in any way. What I am saying is a family with no stable income is not the right place for a host child. So you want to take this kid's family's $4,000 to use because you currently don't have an income to support yourselves. And you think $4,000 will be enough to cover not just rent and utilities and food (+ one extra mouth to feed) but also emergency expenses? How are you going to afford for the kid's health insurance? What if he gets sick and needs a doctor? What if he knocks a tooth out? What if he breaks an arm? Gets in an accident? Or even dies while he's in your care? Your family will be the ones held responsible and if you have no income I doubt you have the health insurance to cover anything. Even if you're on government-assisted health insurance, that's not going to cover the kid. Exchange programs do not exist because they like to make money. They exist to allow children a chance to experience something new. The money that goes to fund them is not just stuffed inside the wallet of the president. It's used to find further advertisement, administration costs, money to pay for the workers, and also to provide health insurance to the child so when accidents do happen, you will not be the ones held responsible.
My family is trying to host foreign exchange students from South Korea in our house. We have no income, so we have nothing else to do but this. We live in Howard County in Maryland, a #3 rated for its educational system. We want to spark some interest in those exchange students to come live and study here. We tried getting connections through a foreign exchange administering organization in South Korea, but they charge the students 5k and we get 600 per month. So we want to lower that by about 1k and receive the rest of the money; it is cheaper for the exchange student, and a plus for us. But we have absolutely NO way of selling ourselves. I was thinking website, but how can we verify our authenticity without looking suspicious as those computer ads? How can we make these people believe we are trustworthy people? PLEASE WHAT CAN WE DO? Note: We have already had one foreign exchange from South Korea, and he LOVED the experience. But connections that he gives us all say we are too expensive (because they are from a poorer region.) We do have ONE reference though; we just need to spread the word somehow. Ps. I see where you are coming from, but I would just like to state that that my siblings are the ones who are currently supporting our family in terms of income. The reason we can even stay in these parts of the neighborhood is because we can ONLY pay our morgage, electric, water, all living expenses. As for health insurance issues and such, this is all covered in the contract that we sign when they come to our house to homestay. There's even an associated dedicated to making money off of providing a house to stay in to get an education in America, so I'm sorry, but these foreign exchange students do not feel that what we do is terrible, nor do we. They require what is needed to succeed in America. They simply require a home to stay in in America, because their parents cannot afford to stay in America, but they need the good education that America provides them. I suppose it is not exactly a Foreign exchange program, more of a Rent for foreigners. Pss. The association is located in the Asian countries, so you would most likely not know about it; different rules apply, I suppose
Studying Abroad - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Your family has no income so you want to make money off the students you host. Do you not understand how completely terrible that sounds? If you are trying to host students who only want to come to the US to practice English and experience a new culture to make money, then your hearts are in entirely the wrong place. If your family has no money then you should not be hosting students--period. You should not be trying to arrange your own private hosting "service." I wouldn't be surprised if this was against the law for one (because you'll essentially be running a business without going through the proper channels), but also it is extremely dangerous for the kids involved. And I'm not saying that you are dangerous here. I'm not suggesting you might harm them purposefully in any way. What I am saying is a family with no stable income is not the right place for a host child. So you want to take this kid's family's $4,000 to use because you currently don't have an income to support yourselves. And you think $4,000 will be enough to cover not just rent and utilities and food (+ one extra mouth to feed) but also emergency expenses? How are you going to afford for the kid's health insurance? What if he gets sick and needs a doctor? What if he knocks a tooth out? What if he breaks an arm? Gets in an accident? Or even dies while he's in your care? Your family will be the ones held responsible and if you have no income I doubt you have the health insurance to cover anything. Even if you're on government-assisted health insurance, that's not going to cover the kid. Exchange programs do not exist because they like to make money. They exist to allow children a chance to experience something new. The money that goes to fund them is not just stuffed inside the wallet of the president. It's used to find further advertisement, administration costs, money to pay for the workers, and also to provide health insurance to the child so when accidents do happen, you will not be the ones held responsible.
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Would a $25K Tax Credit for New Hires of Americans in USA be Good?
Would a $25K Tax Credit for New Hires of Americans in USA be Good?
This would be a one year deal. If you hire a US citizen to work for a US company in USA, then you get a tax credit for the first $25,000 that you pay to that US citizen working for your US company in USA. It's actually Constitutional to make laws for the benefit of US citizens. There's no requirement in the Constitution that every single one of our laws has to benefit somebody else, maybe in Taiwan or India, or South Korea, or China. It's OK for the Congress to help Americans. That's why we call this country OUR COUNTRY!! This tax credit is a lot of money, and businesses should not be encouraged to hire frivolously employees that are not doing real jobs just to get the tax credit -- safeguards need to be there to prevent this sort of "gaming the system" dislocation. All tax credit claims should be scrutinized carefully to make sure they are justified and in good faith -- actual factual good faith -- not phony, not contrived rip offs. But you get more of the things you reward. If you massively reward hiring US citizens in USA, you will get more of that. If you can break the back of unemployment -- you can break the back of this Recession. Once people are being paid to do jobs, they have money. When they have money, demand picks up. When there is demand, business picks up. When business picks up then all the greedy millionaires become multi-millionaires, and the multi-millionaires become billionaires. So the employable are benefitted, the businesses are benefitted, and as usual the rich are benefitted. The only people that don't get a benefit here are the hard core unemployable. But this isn't the first place, they have failed to get a benefit, so please don't hold that against my suggestion. The structurally indigent poor we will always have with us -- you imagine that I thought of that -- but actually somebody said it before me. Guess who. So, what's the downside? I was hoping you wouldn't ask, but now you have, so I'll be frank. Tax rates go back to 1999 levels for everybody, rich, poor, middle class, everybody. You can't spend all money in all directions all the time on everything and then expect to have any money. My suggestion is better than the Obama plan because it is laser pinpoint focused on the actual problem I am trying to solve. I want to end the Great Recession. So I want more Americans employed in USA. So, that's what I want to spend my money on --- Reward what you really want. You get more of what you reward. You think I should get the Peter Drucker Prize for Management by Objectives, but I will actually settle for two smelt and a scrod, thank you so much, just toss them into my pool. Ahhhhh... that is delicious!! The Little Friend of all Mankind -- Dolphin314etc HOW ABOUT SOME ANSWERS THAT REFLECT THAT YOU READ MY QUESTION -- AND ASSESSED IT CONTENTS -- NOT JUST KNEEJERK FRIEDMANISM. I TAUGHT ECON 101 THREE DECADES AGO, SO I KNOW WHAT FRIEDMAN SAYS. BUT WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT MY SPECIFIC PROPOSAL -- NOT YOUR CUT AND PASTE BOILERPLATE THAT YOU HEARD ON LIMBAUGH/HANNITY/BECK. WHY WOULD IT BE SO BAD TO TRY TO GET SOME AMERICANS HIRED IN USA? WHY WOULD SPENDING MONEY IN THE HANDS OF THE MIDDLE CLASS BE SO CONTRARY TO HELPING THE RECOVERY? WHY WOULD A STRONG ONE YEAR PROGRAM TO BREAK THE RECESSION BE THE END OF CAPITALISM? JUST A FEW MOMENTS OF THOUGHT -- IS THAT ASKING TOO MUCH? DOH!
Other - Politics & Government - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The tax credit is just a gimmick meant to make it look like the Obama administration is doing something. Tax credits to hire employees only make sense if the employer has a need to hire employees, which would happen whether or not there is a tax credit. The only reason to hire someone is that you have more work than can be accomplished by your current labor force. Until and unless we lower tax rates for everyone, we will have 10% or more unemployment
2 :
1. Make all of the Bush Tax Cuts Permanent 2. Make major cuts in government spending including major cuts in entitlement programs 3. Get rid of all the government regulations that hurt business 4. Leave the market alone to fix economic and marketing problems
This would be a one year deal. If you hire a US citizen to work for a US company in USA, then you get a tax credit for the first $25,000 that you pay to that US citizen working for your US company in USA. It's actually Constitutional to make laws for the benefit of US citizens. There's no requirement in the Constitution that every single one of our laws has to benefit somebody else, maybe in Taiwan or India, or South Korea, or China. It's OK for the Congress to help Americans. That's why we call this country OUR COUNTRY!! This tax credit is a lot of money, and businesses should not be encouraged to hire frivolously employees that are not doing real jobs just to get the tax credit -- safeguards need to be there to prevent this sort of "gaming the system" dislocation. All tax credit claims should be scrutinized carefully to make sure they are justified and in good faith -- actual factual good faith -- not phony, not contrived rip offs. But you get more of the things you reward. If you massively reward hiring US citizens in USA, you will get more of that. If you can break the back of unemployment -- you can break the back of this Recession. Once people are being paid to do jobs, they have money. When they have money, demand picks up. When there is demand, business picks up. When business picks up then all the greedy millionaires become multi-millionaires, and the multi-millionaires become billionaires. So the employable are benefitted, the businesses are benefitted, and as usual the rich are benefitted. The only people that don't get a benefit here are the hard core unemployable. But this isn't the first place, they have failed to get a benefit, so please don't hold that against my suggestion. The structurally indigent poor we will always have with us -- you imagine that I thought of that -- but actually somebody said it before me. Guess who. So, what's the downside? I was hoping you wouldn't ask, but now you have, so I'll be frank. Tax rates go back to 1999 levels for everybody, rich, poor, middle class, everybody. You can't spend all money in all directions all the time on everything and then expect to have any money. My suggestion is better than the Obama plan because it is laser pinpoint focused on the actual problem I am trying to solve. I want to end the Great Recession. So I want more Americans employed in USA. So, that's what I want to spend my money on --- Reward what you really want. You get more of what you reward. You think I should get the Peter Drucker Prize for Management by Objectives, but I will actually settle for two smelt and a scrod, thank you so much, just toss them into my pool. Ahhhhh... that is delicious!! The Little Friend of all Mankind -- Dolphin314etc HOW ABOUT SOME ANSWERS THAT REFLECT THAT YOU READ MY QUESTION -- AND ASSESSED IT CONTENTS -- NOT JUST KNEEJERK FRIEDMANISM. I TAUGHT ECON 101 THREE DECADES AGO, SO I KNOW WHAT FRIEDMAN SAYS. BUT WHAT DO YOU SAY ABOUT MY SPECIFIC PROPOSAL -- NOT YOUR CUT AND PASTE BOILERPLATE THAT YOU HEARD ON LIMBAUGH/HANNITY/BECK. WHY WOULD IT BE SO BAD TO TRY TO GET SOME AMERICANS HIRED IN USA? WHY WOULD SPENDING MONEY IN THE HANDS OF THE MIDDLE CLASS BE SO CONTRARY TO HELPING THE RECOVERY? WHY WOULD A STRONG ONE YEAR PROGRAM TO BREAK THE RECESSION BE THE END OF CAPITALISM? JUST A FEW MOMENTS OF THOUGHT -- IS THAT ASKING TOO MUCH? DOH!
Other - Politics & Government - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The tax credit is just a gimmick meant to make it look like the Obama administration is doing something. Tax credits to hire employees only make sense if the employer has a need to hire employees, which would happen whether or not there is a tax credit. The only reason to hire someone is that you have more work than can be accomplished by your current labor force. Until and unless we lower tax rates for everyone, we will have 10% or more unemployment
2 :
1. Make all of the Bush Tax Cuts Permanent 2. Make major cuts in government spending including major cuts in entitlement programs 3. Get rid of all the government regulations that hurt business 4. Leave the market alone to fix economic and marketing problems
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Can you translate this into Vietnamese?
Can you translate this into Vietnamese?
While delivering a student's dry cleaning, Geum Jan Di saves the life of a student at the most prestigious school in South Korea. Her actions soon became public and exposes the bullying within the school. To silence the public's attention, Jan Di is offered a swimming scholarship to Shinhwa which she declines but her family forces her to attend. During her first day at Shinhwa, Jan Di learns of the famous F4 and of the other students' adoration and fixation with the boys in the group. Gu Jun Pyo, Yoon Ji Hoo, So Yi Jung, and Song Woo Bin are the richest and most powerful kids within Shinhwa and South Korea. Subsequently, they use their power to terrorize weaker students or those they do not like. Jan Di, instead of being impressed, becomes enraged and fantasizes about confronting Gu Jun Pyo, the leader and initiator of many of the bullying acts. She gains courage to confront him when a friend, Oh Min Ji, accidentally spills ice cream on his shoes and he demands the girl to lick it off. Jan Di defends her friend and attempts to reason with Jun Pyo's tyrannical demand. When he refuses to relent, Jan Di turns violent, knocking Jun Pyo to the ground. Engaged by this, Gu Jun Pyo declares war on Jan Di and encourages the other students to bully her. Jan Di, however, is resistant, refusing to apologize to Gu Jun Pyo, and stands by her decision to fight him. Ironically, Gu Jun Pyo, having never been stood up to, begins to develop feelings for her. He tries unsuccessfully to woo her as she slowly begins to spend more time with Jun Pyo and his friends. Jan Di teaches Jun Pyo that money cannot buy everything and in order to have real friends, he himself must be real or use his heart, but Gu Jun Pyo still does not understand why someone like Jan Di should dislike him. As the story progresses, Jun Pyo falls deeper in love with Jan Di and she learns how to open herself to his love as well. Jan Di's best friend, Ga Eul often finds herself in the same place as Yi Jung. Though she finds him attractive, she is initially annoyed by his arrogance. One day, Yi Jung finds Ga Eul crying after she is dumped by her boyfriend. He advises her to let him go, and later, to make her feel better, the two show up to a club in which he is attending. Yi Jung pretends to be in love with Ga Eul to make her ex jealous. He gives her his scarf and walks her home. After this, Ga Eul finds herself smitten with Yi Jung. On Valentine's Day, she waits outside his house, planning to give him chocolates. He shows up with two girls on his arm and on his table, he already has dozens of chocolates from other girls. When Ga Eul is upset, Yi Jung reminds her that their night at the club was only an act, and it's not his fault if she took it too seriously. Yi Jung feels bad, and gives Ga Eul a cake and flowers, when he mistakenly thinks it's her birthday. The two become friendly again. As love begins to blossom between Jan Di and Jun Pyo, Jun Pyo's mother discovers them and deems it unsuitable. She does everything in her power to keep the two apart, even arranging a marriage for Jun Pyo. The other F4 members and Ga Eul try to bring them back together. Yi Jung and Song Woo Bin came up with a few plans, but they fail. They resort to So Yi Jung and Ga Eul pretending to go on a fake date, which upsets Jan Di because she doesn't consider Yi Jung good enough for her friend. She follows the two around with Jun Pyo by her side, making sure Yi Jung is treating Ga Eul appropriately. At first their plan was successful but because of Jun Pyo's mother, their relationship became strained again. After their date, Ga Eul finds her self falling for Yi Jung again. Yi Jung feels the same way, but he can't bring himself to admit it, due to his doubt in true love. After a talk with the first girl Yi Jung loved, Ga Eul admits to Yi Jung how she feels about him and asks if he'll go on a real date with her. He rejects her, saying he doesn't date nice girls, foolish girls, or girls connected to his friends. He later changes his mind, and takes her out, though he spends all his time ignoring Ga Eul, and talking to other women. Their date ends with Ga Eul throwing water in Yi Jung's face. Other factors keep arising as another member of the group falls in love with Jan Di (which was Yoon Ji Hoo) and in a twist of fate, Jun Pyo loses his memory. A girl named Jang Yu Mi which was on the same hospital where Jun Pyo was confined, takes advantage on him to make him fall in love with her. Geum Jan Di never gives up for Jun Pyo to remember his love for her, she falls in the swimming pool letting Jun Pyo reminise his love for her. On Jan Di's graduation, Jun Pyo proposes to her on the cable car at the NamSan Tower where their first date was held. Gu Jun Pyo told Jan Di that he needs to study abroad to fix problems regarding Shinhwa. Jun Pyo asks Jan Di to accompany him as his wife but Jan Di refuses because she has also plans for her future becoming a doctor. The two agreed b
Languages - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Oh My God, Try dispensing it in little or shorter paragraphs so people could actually go beyond the first few line without zoning out. I am not being mean in any way but seriously i can assure you no one is going to read all of that.
2 :
i agree wit the person. by why do u want to translate boys over flover(BOF) into Vietnamese..
3 :
Are you serious?!?
While delivering a student's dry cleaning, Geum Jan Di saves the life of a student at the most prestigious school in South Korea. Her actions soon became public and exposes the bullying within the school. To silence the public's attention, Jan Di is offered a swimming scholarship to Shinhwa which she declines but her family forces her to attend. During her first day at Shinhwa, Jan Di learns of the famous F4 and of the other students' adoration and fixation with the boys in the group. Gu Jun Pyo, Yoon Ji Hoo, So Yi Jung, and Song Woo Bin are the richest and most powerful kids within Shinhwa and South Korea. Subsequently, they use their power to terrorize weaker students or those they do not like. Jan Di, instead of being impressed, becomes enraged and fantasizes about confronting Gu Jun Pyo, the leader and initiator of many of the bullying acts. She gains courage to confront him when a friend, Oh Min Ji, accidentally spills ice cream on his shoes and he demands the girl to lick it off. Jan Di defends her friend and attempts to reason with Jun Pyo's tyrannical demand. When he refuses to relent, Jan Di turns violent, knocking Jun Pyo to the ground. Engaged by this, Gu Jun Pyo declares war on Jan Di and encourages the other students to bully her. Jan Di, however, is resistant, refusing to apologize to Gu Jun Pyo, and stands by her decision to fight him. Ironically, Gu Jun Pyo, having never been stood up to, begins to develop feelings for her. He tries unsuccessfully to woo her as she slowly begins to spend more time with Jun Pyo and his friends. Jan Di teaches Jun Pyo that money cannot buy everything and in order to have real friends, he himself must be real or use his heart, but Gu Jun Pyo still does not understand why someone like Jan Di should dislike him. As the story progresses, Jun Pyo falls deeper in love with Jan Di and she learns how to open herself to his love as well. Jan Di's best friend, Ga Eul often finds herself in the same place as Yi Jung. Though she finds him attractive, she is initially annoyed by his arrogance. One day, Yi Jung finds Ga Eul crying after she is dumped by her boyfriend. He advises her to let him go, and later, to make her feel better, the two show up to a club in which he is attending. Yi Jung pretends to be in love with Ga Eul to make her ex jealous. He gives her his scarf and walks her home. After this, Ga Eul finds herself smitten with Yi Jung. On Valentine's Day, she waits outside his house, planning to give him chocolates. He shows up with two girls on his arm and on his table, he already has dozens of chocolates from other girls. When Ga Eul is upset, Yi Jung reminds her that their night at the club was only an act, and it's not his fault if she took it too seriously. Yi Jung feels bad, and gives Ga Eul a cake and flowers, when he mistakenly thinks it's her birthday. The two become friendly again. As love begins to blossom between Jan Di and Jun Pyo, Jun Pyo's mother discovers them and deems it unsuitable. She does everything in her power to keep the two apart, even arranging a marriage for Jun Pyo. The other F4 members and Ga Eul try to bring them back together. Yi Jung and Song Woo Bin came up with a few plans, but they fail. They resort to So Yi Jung and Ga Eul pretending to go on a fake date, which upsets Jan Di because she doesn't consider Yi Jung good enough for her friend. She follows the two around with Jun Pyo by her side, making sure Yi Jung is treating Ga Eul appropriately. At first their plan was successful but because of Jun Pyo's mother, their relationship became strained again. After their date, Ga Eul finds her self falling for Yi Jung again. Yi Jung feels the same way, but he can't bring himself to admit it, due to his doubt in true love. After a talk with the first girl Yi Jung loved, Ga Eul admits to Yi Jung how she feels about him and asks if he'll go on a real date with her. He rejects her, saying he doesn't date nice girls, foolish girls, or girls connected to his friends. He later changes his mind, and takes her out, though he spends all his time ignoring Ga Eul, and talking to other women. Their date ends with Ga Eul throwing water in Yi Jung's face. Other factors keep arising as another member of the group falls in love with Jan Di (which was Yoon Ji Hoo) and in a twist of fate, Jun Pyo loses his memory. A girl named Jang Yu Mi which was on the same hospital where Jun Pyo was confined, takes advantage on him to make him fall in love with her. Geum Jan Di never gives up for Jun Pyo to remember his love for her, she falls in the swimming pool letting Jun Pyo reminise his love for her. On Jan Di's graduation, Jun Pyo proposes to her on the cable car at the NamSan Tower where their first date was held. Gu Jun Pyo told Jan Di that he needs to study abroad to fix problems regarding Shinhwa. Jun Pyo asks Jan Di to accompany him as his wife but Jan Di refuses because she has also plans for her future becoming a doctor. The two agreed b
Languages - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Oh My God, Try dispensing it in little or shorter paragraphs so people could actually go beyond the first few line without zoning out. I am not being mean in any way but seriously i can assure you no one is going to read all of that.
2 :
i agree wit the person. by why do u want to translate boys over flover(BOF) into Vietnamese..
3 :
Are you serious?!?
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
What do you think of the first 100 days of Obama?
What do you think of the first 100 days of Obama?
Well here's how i see it. He just past a "New Deal" stimulus and he didn't even read it. Why is this bad? Who the hell is going to pay for it? There isn't enough rich people to pay for this! So we're going to tax the upper class or aka the class which runs most of the business in America- good idea just hurt the actual producers of wealth. If Obama and the liberals cant learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. When FDR took office in 1933 unemployment was over 24%. In 1939, it was 17.2%. In 1943 (During WW2) it was 1.9%. In FDRs seventh year in office, unemployment was still over 17% (Before WW2). That doesnt really seem to me like something that worked really well. World War II on the other hand did get us out of the Depression. It made unemployment go away AND it woke up the indurstrial might of the U.S. The New Deal did not. I certainly do not want another world war. Obamas New Deal is also something I could do without- like the fact that he trippled our national debt. How about the high spending and expansion of Government? Or the large amounts of government programs being launched? JUST LIKE THE CARTER YEARS! Remember what that lead to? 10 million unemployed and double digit inflation ring a bell? Since taxes are going to be raised- remember how those big taxes destroyed our economy back then? Remember how wind fall taxes lead to our oil prices going up- well those taxes are coming back! Don't you people learn from history? More government, more spending, and more taxes does NOT lead to economic growth! Just look at how Germany rebuilt itself after WW2- it used economic policies that are very similar to Reaganomics! Good Job Obama, you're using the same shit thats failed many times before! I love how he also thought that he had the right to take over a company! Or how he could fire the members! He only had 2% of the company and i guess he thought 2%=100%! Where in the constitution does it allow the president and the government to just take over a company like that?- don't even worry about looking in the constitution- cus it's not there! As far as i'm concerned, he could get impeached for such an action. I also find it amazing with the way he handled North Korea. Our military says they can shoot the damn missile down. We've done this before- remember the satillite? South Korea and Japan have already said that they wouldn't hesitate to declare war on North Korea if they get violent- after all Japan and South Korea have better equipped and trained armies than North Korea. SO WHY DON'T YOU JUSLT SHOOT IT DOWN? No instead he goes to the UN who never gets anything done. UN's only achievements are in desert storm and the Korean war- when we were leading them! My point is simple - we're the world superpower, make a damn statement- "WE WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS."... Instead he decides to do nothing... Lets chat with the world's dictators. Good idea right- be nice to them. When in history has diplomacy worked with nut-jobs? When JFK tried it the Berlin wall went up and then the Cuban missile crisis happened- all cus he was weak! Remember Hitler? Ever heard of "Taking out the cancer tomber before it gets bigger."? Or did Obama forget about Bush? Bush did try to negociate- they didn't want to. IT'S Bush's fault! Ever heard of the Community Reinvestment Act? The very act that lead to the closing of our banks- the one that forced banks to give out the very bad loans that lead to our economy's demise. Funny right? When the banks closed because of this act- many of the remaining banks had almost no money- this lead to lack of spending because banks weren't giving out loans. How was it Bush's fault? How about the very safe nation Bush gave us? The one Clinton NEVER gave us. Last time i checked the closing of banks, gas crisis (Caused by lack of supply and over speculation), high spending (Caused by many republicans, war, and many democrats), and the state economies that began to collapse by liberal leadership like NJ, NY, and Michigan lead to our economic demise- NOT the leadership of Bush. That is FACT. Obama is going to cut spending- just like Carter said. The only spending that will be cut is our deffense and military budgets! BUT he will increase spending on many social issues. Spending our way out of this WILL NOT WORK- It has NEVER worked in the past. Three tax cheats that were chosen for treasury... Good judgement. LMAO- best administration so far! So what's next? Wall Street Journal, NY Times, FOX, ABC, and even CNN! say that a 50% tax might be on its way... But i think that is enough to say... My point is that this man is not doing a good job. We're going to see higher taxes, more taxes, and bigger government. You want examples of where this has failed? Look at NY, NJ, Michigan, Carter years, FDR years, Nixon Years, Italy when Mucalini was ruling, Germany when Hitler had power (look at how bad his economy was- i'm not calling Obama a nazi.), and europe now, which has be
Government - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I didn't even have to read all that to know that he has done a horrible job. He's a good orator and smooth talker but that's about all. I could sit here and write pages about why he has set us, and our future generations, so far back. I think it would be futile. People will only understand as they see the fruits of this Obamanation. They only thing I can say he has been successful at is cramming socialism and liberal special interests down our throats at an amazing rate.
2 :
Obama has been great for most boomer wh will be retiring in the next five years. He farther extends their throw America in teh crapper lifestyel of not saving. Obama has been the worse president in history for people under 45. Get ready, protect yourself. If you are married make sure both spoused stay viable to work if needed.
3 :
I agree with you, totally. Obama is an idiot. He got a free ride into his presidency with the press. Now, he's single handedly destroying our country. He's a two faced bastard, who doesn't have the balls to disagree with the loudest people in the US (the democrats). "Oh I think I will pull the troops out of Iraq to make the country happy, but start a war in Afghanistan." If that were Bush, do you know how much grief he would have gotten. This new war is a waste of time. Russia and Great Britain went into Afghanistan before, and both came out with their tails in between their legs. What an idiot Obama is. "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it." All I can say is, if he's already done this much in one hundred days, these next four years are going to be hell.
4 :
NICE!
5 :
GROSS! You're trying to defend the Bush administration. You should be ashamed of yourself. You sound SOOOO stupid.
6 :
So far so good. Soon the US will be completely bankrupt and Obama would be blamed for it but the fact is that Bush started the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
7 :
Very proud of his accomplishments during the first 100 days. He inherited a fetid situation from the mismaged previous administration.
8 :
What do I think? I think he's proven he's everything I thought he was; a gang-banger in a suit turned despot who is high on power and has full intentions of ripping this country to shreds with full permission from the ignorant racists and yellow-dogs that voted him into office and help from Satan himself.
9 :
I completely agree with you. The Obama administration “celebrated†100 days of appeasement, incompetence, tax dodging, America-bashing, arrogance, spending like there’s no tomorrow, a photo op that scared our largest city, bowing to arab kings, and more. One of the worst things (I know, there are so many to choose from) Obummer’s done is to saddle our kids and grand kids with a massive debt, thanks to the massive Porkulus bill. o_O
Well here's how i see it. He just past a "New Deal" stimulus and he didn't even read it. Why is this bad? Who the hell is going to pay for it? There isn't enough rich people to pay for this! So we're going to tax the upper class or aka the class which runs most of the business in America- good idea just hurt the actual producers of wealth. If Obama and the liberals cant learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. When FDR took office in 1933 unemployment was over 24%. In 1939, it was 17.2%. In 1943 (During WW2) it was 1.9%. In FDRs seventh year in office, unemployment was still over 17% (Before WW2). That doesnt really seem to me like something that worked really well. World War II on the other hand did get us out of the Depression. It made unemployment go away AND it woke up the indurstrial might of the U.S. The New Deal did not. I certainly do not want another world war. Obamas New Deal is also something I could do without- like the fact that he trippled our national debt. How about the high spending and expansion of Government? Or the large amounts of government programs being launched? JUST LIKE THE CARTER YEARS! Remember what that lead to? 10 million unemployed and double digit inflation ring a bell? Since taxes are going to be raised- remember how those big taxes destroyed our economy back then? Remember how wind fall taxes lead to our oil prices going up- well those taxes are coming back! Don't you people learn from history? More government, more spending, and more taxes does NOT lead to economic growth! Just look at how Germany rebuilt itself after WW2- it used economic policies that are very similar to Reaganomics! Good Job Obama, you're using the same shit thats failed many times before! I love how he also thought that he had the right to take over a company! Or how he could fire the members! He only had 2% of the company and i guess he thought 2%=100%! Where in the constitution does it allow the president and the government to just take over a company like that?- don't even worry about looking in the constitution- cus it's not there! As far as i'm concerned, he could get impeached for such an action. I also find it amazing with the way he handled North Korea. Our military says they can shoot the damn missile down. We've done this before- remember the satillite? South Korea and Japan have already said that they wouldn't hesitate to declare war on North Korea if they get violent- after all Japan and South Korea have better equipped and trained armies than North Korea. SO WHY DON'T YOU JUSLT SHOOT IT DOWN? No instead he goes to the UN who never gets anything done. UN's only achievements are in desert storm and the Korean war- when we were leading them! My point is simple - we're the world superpower, make a damn statement- "WE WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS."... Instead he decides to do nothing... Lets chat with the world's dictators. Good idea right- be nice to them. When in history has diplomacy worked with nut-jobs? When JFK tried it the Berlin wall went up and then the Cuban missile crisis happened- all cus he was weak! Remember Hitler? Ever heard of "Taking out the cancer tomber before it gets bigger."? Or did Obama forget about Bush? Bush did try to negociate- they didn't want to. IT'S Bush's fault! Ever heard of the Community Reinvestment Act? The very act that lead to the closing of our banks- the one that forced banks to give out the very bad loans that lead to our economy's demise. Funny right? When the banks closed because of this act- many of the remaining banks had almost no money- this lead to lack of spending because banks weren't giving out loans. How was it Bush's fault? How about the very safe nation Bush gave us? The one Clinton NEVER gave us. Last time i checked the closing of banks, gas crisis (Caused by lack of supply and over speculation), high spending (Caused by many republicans, war, and many democrats), and the state economies that began to collapse by liberal leadership like NJ, NY, and Michigan lead to our economic demise- NOT the leadership of Bush. That is FACT. Obama is going to cut spending- just like Carter said. The only spending that will be cut is our deffense and military budgets! BUT he will increase spending on many social issues. Spending our way out of this WILL NOT WORK- It has NEVER worked in the past. Three tax cheats that were chosen for treasury... Good judgement. LMAO- best administration so far! So what's next? Wall Street Journal, NY Times, FOX, ABC, and even CNN! say that a 50% tax might be on its way... But i think that is enough to say... My point is that this man is not doing a good job. We're going to see higher taxes, more taxes, and bigger government. You want examples of where this has failed? Look at NY, NJ, Michigan, Carter years, FDR years, Nixon Years, Italy when Mucalini was ruling, Germany when Hitler had power (look at how bad his economy was- i'm not calling Obama a nazi.), and europe now, which has be
Government - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I didn't even have to read all that to know that he has done a horrible job. He's a good orator and smooth talker but that's about all. I could sit here and write pages about why he has set us, and our future generations, so far back. I think it would be futile. People will only understand as they see the fruits of this Obamanation. They only thing I can say he has been successful at is cramming socialism and liberal special interests down our throats at an amazing rate.
2 :
Obama has been great for most boomer wh will be retiring in the next five years. He farther extends their throw America in teh crapper lifestyel of not saving. Obama has been the worse president in history for people under 45. Get ready, protect yourself. If you are married make sure both spoused stay viable to work if needed.
3 :
I agree with you, totally. Obama is an idiot. He got a free ride into his presidency with the press. Now, he's single handedly destroying our country. He's a two faced bastard, who doesn't have the balls to disagree with the loudest people in the US (the democrats). "Oh I think I will pull the troops out of Iraq to make the country happy, but start a war in Afghanistan." If that were Bush, do you know how much grief he would have gotten. This new war is a waste of time. Russia and Great Britain went into Afghanistan before, and both came out with their tails in between their legs. What an idiot Obama is. "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it." All I can say is, if he's already done this much in one hundred days, these next four years are going to be hell.
4 :
NICE!
5 :
GROSS! You're trying to defend the Bush administration. You should be ashamed of yourself. You sound SOOOO stupid.
6 :
So far so good. Soon the US will be completely bankrupt and Obama would be blamed for it but the fact is that Bush started the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
7 :
Very proud of his accomplishments during the first 100 days. He inherited a fetid situation from the mismaged previous administration.
8 :
What do I think? I think he's proven he's everything I thought he was; a gang-banger in a suit turned despot who is high on power and has full intentions of ripping this country to shreds with full permission from the ignorant racists and yellow-dogs that voted him into office and help from Satan himself.
9 :
I completely agree with you. The Obama administration “celebrated†100 days of appeasement, incompetence, tax dodging, America-bashing, arrogance, spending like there’s no tomorrow, a photo op that scared our largest city, bowing to arab kings, and more. One of the worst things (I know, there are so many to choose from) Obummer’s done is to saddle our kids and grand kids with a massive debt, thanks to the massive Porkulus bill. o_O
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Army; Authorizing OCONUS Travel for Spouse due to PCS?
Army; Authorizing OCONUS Travel for Spouse due to PCS?
I have been having a huge problem with the Army concerning this ordeal, so just let me start from the beginning: I was stationed in Korea for a period of two years (April 08 - April 10). I met my wife in Korea, she is a Korean national, and we wed in February 2010. After we got married I went to my S1 shop to make sure she would get put on my orders since I was PCSing soon. They told me to wait until I actually get my orders. Well something messed up and I had to report to Ft. Knox, Ky on the day I was supposed to DEROS. So when I got those orders I took them to S1 to amend the orders and put my wife on them. Then they told me I couldn't do that since I don't have 1 year left on my contract, (but I was barred from re-enlisting at that time due to a medical condition. Otherwise I would have). So they told me when I get to Knox, the S1 there can do it. So I arrived here at Knox on April 12th, and immediatly began working on getting my wife over here. I went to S1 to talk to them about amending my orders, but they said it's impossible to do it in Ky since the orders were cut in Korea. They got a hold of someone back in Korea and said it was absolutely possible my wife could have been put on orders to travel to the States at the governments expense (since she is my dependent). Either my last S1 didn't know about it, or were too lazy. So the S1 and finance office began helping me put her on my orders. They have been communicating with someone back in Korea to help me out. Finally my orders were amended from the original to stating this, (I am only copying the pertinate paragraph): (d) Dependents (YES) reimbursement for land travel in the continental United States during the Permanent Change of Station portion of movement to assist in the movement of your dependents, privately owned vehicle and HHG is limited to that from the cost effective APOD to the authorized designated location of your dependents at Pocheon City, South Korea 487-831 and onward movement to your next duty station. Ok. Now I spotted this problem from the get-go. It states "Reimbursement for land travel in the continental United States". There is no mention of overseas travel. Now. My wife went to the travel office back in Korea with the original orders, and the amended orders. But they gave no mention of that little part, all they told her was that she is unauthorized to fly at the govt's expense because she is a Korean, and we married in Korea. I have never, in my military career, heard of that type of rule before. As far as I was aware, dependents are authorized free travel as long as they are on orders. Doesn't matter if they are Korean, Philipino, Russian, or Mexican. She has an ID card, is enrolled in TriCare, has a passport, and her Visa. There shouldn't be any issues here. So what my S1 is attempting to do now, is contact their contact in Korea and see if he can amend the orders once more and put in she is authorized overseas flight travel. But they said it probably wouldn't work. Tickets are about $1,200 and I don't have that kind of money to spend on a ticket, and the medical portion of her Visa expires in a month. Has anyone ever heard of a dependent being denied authorized travel due to being a non-US citizen (even though she is listed as my dependent)? Does anyone have any experience in this kind of a situation? How about a regulation I can throw in their face? I was searching the internet but couldn't really find anything on this. And are there any other options I can use in-case the orders thing falls through? I know this was long, and I appreciate any help I can get. 19K
Military - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I have 2 points to state here: 1. Write your Congressional Representative. The military had to approve your marriage and obviously approved your orders (amended) so they are in the wrong and need to be held accountable. Trust me when I say, writing your congressman gets results. Just do yourself a favor and make sure your commander knows what you are doing. They hate surprise calls about congressionals. 2. If she has a passport and a visa, as you stated, why not just buy her a ticket and get her over here? Yes it would cost you, but I bet your bride would appreciate your effort. Good luck and thanks for your service.
2 :
She cannot use Space A for travel as she is overseas herself without you with her. She could have used it while you were stationed overseas to travel to and from the mainland or if you are deployed longer than 120 days. But as she is attempting to move to the US from Korea it is not an option. She could have been authorized travel even if she is Korean because she is listed as a dependent. But because the orders were amended after you had reported in the US that could be why they will not grant her the ticket. You can go to Army Family Services and talk to them about it and see if they will give you teh money to pay for hte ticket. This would be a loan that you repay back each month but it is an option. Then when she arrives you take the ticket and file it with Travel office and see if they will refund the money. She does need to fly on an American carrier not Korean.
3 :
she's not authorized cuz she is considered an aquired dependent.. she was NOT on your orders to Korea so she is ineligible to be flown From Korea to your next duty station. you will have to foot the bill yourself or get a AER loan to cover it. In other words, they never foot the bill for her to go to Korea so they won't foot the bill for her to leave Korea. her being a dependent is not in question. only her eligibility for authorized travel expenses. once she arrives in the States all orders after that should have her included automatically(Ibarring any trips to Diego Garcia or Souda Bay)
I have been having a huge problem with the Army concerning this ordeal, so just let me start from the beginning: I was stationed in Korea for a period of two years (April 08 - April 10). I met my wife in Korea, she is a Korean national, and we wed in February 2010. After we got married I went to my S1 shop to make sure she would get put on my orders since I was PCSing soon. They told me to wait until I actually get my orders. Well something messed up and I had to report to Ft. Knox, Ky on the day I was supposed to DEROS. So when I got those orders I took them to S1 to amend the orders and put my wife on them. Then they told me I couldn't do that since I don't have 1 year left on my contract, (but I was barred from re-enlisting at that time due to a medical condition. Otherwise I would have). So they told me when I get to Knox, the S1 there can do it. So I arrived here at Knox on April 12th, and immediatly began working on getting my wife over here. I went to S1 to talk to them about amending my orders, but they said it's impossible to do it in Ky since the orders were cut in Korea. They got a hold of someone back in Korea and said it was absolutely possible my wife could have been put on orders to travel to the States at the governments expense (since she is my dependent). Either my last S1 didn't know about it, or were too lazy. So the S1 and finance office began helping me put her on my orders. They have been communicating with someone back in Korea to help me out. Finally my orders were amended from the original to stating this, (I am only copying the pertinate paragraph): (d) Dependents (YES) reimbursement for land travel in the continental United States during the Permanent Change of Station portion of movement to assist in the movement of your dependents, privately owned vehicle and HHG is limited to that from the cost effective APOD to the authorized designated location of your dependents at Pocheon City, South Korea 487-831 and onward movement to your next duty station. Ok. Now I spotted this problem from the get-go. It states "Reimbursement for land travel in the continental United States". There is no mention of overseas travel. Now. My wife went to the travel office back in Korea with the original orders, and the amended orders. But they gave no mention of that little part, all they told her was that she is unauthorized to fly at the govt's expense because she is a Korean, and we married in Korea. I have never, in my military career, heard of that type of rule before. As far as I was aware, dependents are authorized free travel as long as they are on orders. Doesn't matter if they are Korean, Philipino, Russian, or Mexican. She has an ID card, is enrolled in TriCare, has a passport, and her Visa. There shouldn't be any issues here. So what my S1 is attempting to do now, is contact their contact in Korea and see if he can amend the orders once more and put in she is authorized overseas flight travel. But they said it probably wouldn't work. Tickets are about $1,200 and I don't have that kind of money to spend on a ticket, and the medical portion of her Visa expires in a month. Has anyone ever heard of a dependent being denied authorized travel due to being a non-US citizen (even though she is listed as my dependent)? Does anyone have any experience in this kind of a situation? How about a regulation I can throw in their face? I was searching the internet but couldn't really find anything on this. And are there any other options I can use in-case the orders thing falls through? I know this was long, and I appreciate any help I can get. 19K
Military - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I have 2 points to state here: 1. Write your Congressional Representative. The military had to approve your marriage and obviously approved your orders (amended) so they are in the wrong and need to be held accountable. Trust me when I say, writing your congressman gets results. Just do yourself a favor and make sure your commander knows what you are doing. They hate surprise calls about congressionals. 2. If she has a passport and a visa, as you stated, why not just buy her a ticket and get her over here? Yes it would cost you, but I bet your bride would appreciate your effort. Good luck and thanks for your service.
2 :
She cannot use Space A for travel as she is overseas herself without you with her. She could have used it while you were stationed overseas to travel to and from the mainland or if you are deployed longer than 120 days. But as she is attempting to move to the US from Korea it is not an option. She could have been authorized travel even if she is Korean because she is listed as a dependent. But because the orders were amended after you had reported in the US that could be why they will not grant her the ticket. You can go to Army Family Services and talk to them about it and see if they will give you teh money to pay for hte ticket. This would be a loan that you repay back each month but it is an option. Then when she arrives you take the ticket and file it with Travel office and see if they will refund the money. She does need to fly on an American carrier not Korean.
3 :
she's not authorized cuz she is considered an aquired dependent.. she was NOT on your orders to Korea so she is ineligible to be flown From Korea to your next duty station. you will have to foot the bill yourself or get a AER loan to cover it. In other words, they never foot the bill for her to go to Korea so they won't foot the bill for her to leave Korea. her being a dependent is not in question. only her eligibility for authorized travel expenses. once she arrives in the States all orders after that should have her included automatically(Ibarring any trips to Diego Garcia or Souda Bay)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)